Research Series

Watch this session to learn how to write a successful fellowship (F30, F31, and F32) application! The purpose of the NIH F-type training grant is to provide support to promising graduate and postdoctoral applicants who have the potential to become productive, independent investigators in health-related research fields relevant to the missions of participating NIH institutes. This session began with an overview of the F-award, then covered the grant submission/review process, how to prepare a successful grant, described a study section, and explained scoring and funding.

Learn about the nuts and bolts of an NIH Grant budget straight from the SVCHS Research Administration Office! This overview will provide you with an understanding of the types of budgets, the vocabulary specific to grant budgets, what is and isn't allowable, and more. This session focused in on developing budgets that are responsive to R01 Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs) but also addressed budgeting concepts that cross all funding types.

Part 1: Advance Preparation with NIH Resources- We reviewed online NIH resources that are critical to the development of a competitive RPG application: institute and center (IC) websites, NIH RePORT and RePORTER, and the Center for Scientific Review Assisted Referral Tool. We also discussed how to identify and communicate with appropriate Program Officers and Scientific Review Officers and how to identify the best study section for your application.
 

Research studies are typically classified as qualitative, quantitative, or a combination of the two, referred to as mixed methods research. While many studies use a single approach, mixed methods research has emerged as a valuable design that leverages the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a more comprehensive understanding. It can be used to enhance the interpretation of data, explain quantitative results with qualitative insights, or assess the broader relevance of findings from small qualitative samples.

Watch this informative session on the NIH’s revised approach to grant proposal evaluations, featuring the newly implemented simplified review framework. Dr. Jarlenski presented an overview of this framework, highlighting key changes and their implications for grant applicants. Following the presentation, a distinguished panel of faculty with firsthand experience in various NIH study sections shared their insights and personal experiences navigating the new review process. Attendees had the opportunity to engage in a dynamic Q&A session.

Many research publications are rejected due to weak or inappropriate study design and analysis plan. This course provides a structured introduction to the core principles of designing rigorous quantitative studies, helping researchers avoid common pitfalls and strengthen their work from the ground up. Developing a well-thought-out quantitative study design is critical in ensuring successful analysis and interpretation.

During a time of uncertain federal funding, it is essential for faculty to diversify their research portfolios. This session is designed to equip HS researchers with the skills to leverage AI, particularly tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini, to explore new avenues for obtaining non-federal funding, generate ideas for commercialization, and produce new collaborations that strengthen their financial health.

Career Development Awards, particularly NIH K Awards, are a pivotal funding mechanism for launching and advancing your research career. This seminar will demystify the application process, outline the different types of career development award mechanisms available, and review key components and evaluation criteria. Viewers will receive practical guidance and actionable tips for crafting a compelling and competitive application. Whether you're just getting started or preparing for a resubmission, this session will provide you with essential strategies to ensure your success.

This session offered a faculty-focused roadmap from idea to startup and outlined key steps in the commercialization process. Translation of research into practice is central to Pitt’s mission and strategic vision, especially within the Health Sciences, where commercialization excellence is a core pillar. Panelists discussed how to evaluate the translational potential of your work, navigate intellectual property and regulatory pathways, and identify funding opportunities, including SBIR/STTR grants and dilutive funding.

The Department of Defense is an underutilized source of funding for researchers, and Pitt has resources to help you succeed! The DOD is obligated to award $7.67B in grants annually, with up to $10B in additional funding over five years through a separate mechanism. The Center for Military Medicine Research (CMMR) at Pitt facilitates innovative collaborations and helps to develop winning grant proposals with the goal of advancing medicine for wounded service members and their families.